合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國(guó)保潔 |
美國(guó)強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 礦漿表面張力對(duì)黃鐵礦與磁黃鐵礦浮選回收率的影響（一）
> 水與瓦斯煤之間的表面張力計(jì)算方法及動(dòng)態(tài)潤(rùn)濕機(jī)理研究（一）
> 納米滲吸驅(qū)油劑種類、降低界面張力和改變潤(rùn)濕性的能力等機(jī)理研究（一）
> 拉脫法測(cè)量：不同性能磁性液體的磁表面張力變化規(guī)律與影響因素（二）
> 表面張力對(duì)液滴形變的影響規(guī)律
> 山茶油改性方法、制備原理及在水劑型化妝品中的應(yīng)用（二）
> 低界面張力起泡劑的泡沫性能、用量對(duì)發(fā)泡量、半衰期的影響
> 中性聚合物鍵合劑(NPBA)與奧克托今(HMX)界面張力測(cè)定及應(yīng)用效果（二）
> PG脫酰胺添加量對(duì)玉米醇溶蛋白氣-水動(dòng)態(tài)表面張力的影響
> LB膜技術(shù)在生物基材料改性中的應(yīng)用
推薦新聞Info
-
> 界面張力主導(dǎo)：殘余氣飽和度的深部咸水層CO2封存潛力評(píng)估（三）
> 界面張力主導(dǎo)：殘余氣飽和度的深部咸水層CO2封存潛力評(píng)估（二）
> 界面張力主導(dǎo)：殘余氣飽和度的深部咸水層CO2封存潛力評(píng)估（一）
> 兩類農(nóng)用防霧涂層表面張力的深度計(jì)算與比較分析（二）
> 兩類農(nóng)用防霧涂層表面張力的深度計(jì)算與比較分析（一）
> 藥液表面張力、噴霧方法對(duì)霧滴在水稻植株上沉積的影響（三）
> 藥液表面張力、噴霧方法對(duì)霧滴在水稻植株上沉積的影響（二）
> 藥液表面張力、噴霧方法對(duì)霧滴在水稻植株上沉積的影響（一）
> 烷基二苯醚/烷基苯混合磺酸鹽靜態(tài)表面張力、金屬腐蝕性及凈洗力測(cè)定（二）
> 烷基二苯醚/烷基苯混合磺酸鹽靜態(tài)表面張力、金屬腐蝕性及凈洗力測(cè)定（一）
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來(lái)源：上海謂載 瀏覽 1866 次 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲(chóng)表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時(shí)間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時(shí)。 初始潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測(cè)試了土傳表面的影響 潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會(huì)加速潤(rùn)濕過(guò)程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動(dòng)不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號(hào) 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——概括、介紹
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——材料和方法